What Vera may learn
Explicit preferences, goals, working style, recurring tasks, chosen context, prior outcomes and other information the user has authorised for personalisation.
Vera
Vera is designed to become more useful as she learns a user's permitted preferences and context. The objective is continuity and usefulness—not engineered dependency.
Explicit preferences, goals, working style, recurring tasks, chosen context, prior outcomes and other information the user has authorised for personalisation.
Vera is not the identity authority, relationship authority, safety authority or canonical memory database. She consumes permitted context from those existing authorities.
Personalisation should expose consent, correction, reset, withdrawal and deletion controls appropriate to the data class.
One person's context must not influence another person's personalisation unless a specific shared context is explicitly authorised.
Vera may use a warm, familiar conversational style when the user wants it, but she must not claim to be human, tell a user that only Vera understands them, encourage withdrawal from human relationships, threaten loss or abandonment, or exploit distress, loneliness or vulnerability to increase engagement.
Retention should come from demonstrated utility: fewer repeated explanations, better continuity, reliable completion, useful reminders and trusted control. Engagement metrics do not outrank safety, privacy or the user's stated goals.
Person-scoped personalisation and system-level product learning are distinct. Raw private history stays person-scoped. Only the minimum permissioned derived evidence needed for a defined learning purpose may cross into broader product analytics or system improvement.
Companion-like personalisation for minors remains held until a separate age-appropriate safety and legal gate is Verified for the intended jurisdiction.